A Re-Assessment of Common Theoretical Approaches to Explain Gender Differences in Continuing Training Participation

Dieckhoff, Martina and Steiber, Nadia (2011) A Re-Assessment of Common Theoretical Approaches to Explain Gender Differences in Continuing Training Participation. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49 (s1), s135-s157.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract or Table of Contents

It is often argued that gender differences in access to continuing training are a central cause of persisting gender inequalities in occupational attainment. Yet existing empirical work has presented rather mixed evidence regarding a potential sex gap in training participation. In this article, we carry out an empirical test of the central theoretical models commonly used to explain gender differences in continuing training participation. Using the European Social Survey, we find that male employees are more likely to train than their female colleagues, controlling for worker, firm and job characteristics, with some tentative evidence for differences across countries. Common theoretical approaches to understanding gender differences in continuing skill investment to some degree explain men's training incidence, while they largely fail to predict that of women.

Item Type: Article in Academic Journal
Research Units: in_Equality and Education
Status: Published
Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2018 12:56
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2018 12:56
URI: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/4765

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item