Powersharing and Democratic Survival

Graham, Benjamin A.T.; Miller, Michael K. and Strøm, Kaare W. (July 2016) Powersharing and Democratic Survival. Former Series > Working Paper Series > IHS Political Science Series 141, 41 p.

wp_141.pdf - Published Version

Download (2MB) | Preview
[img] Text
user agreement_kstrom.pdf - Supplemental Material
Restricted to repository staff only

Download (65kB)


Democracy is often fragile, especially in states that have recently experienced civil conflict. To protect emerging democracies, many scholars and practitioners recommend political powersharing institutions. Yet there is little empirical research on whether powersharing promotes democratic survival, and some concern that it can limit electoral accountability. To fill this gap, we differentiate between inclusive, dispersive, and constraining powersharing and analyze their effects on democratic survival using a new global dataset. We find sharp distinctions across types of powersharing and political context. Inclusive powersharing, such as ethnic quotas, promotes democratic survival only in post-conflict settings. In contrast, dispersive institutions such as federalism destabilize post-conflict democracies. Only constraining powersharing consistently facilitates democratic survival in societies both with and without recent conflict. Our results suggest that institution-builders and international organizations should prioritize institutions that constrain leaders, including independent judiciaries, civilian control of the armed forces, and constitutional protections of individual and group rights.

Item Type: IHS Series
Research Units: Former Research Groups (until 2017) > European Integration
Date Deposited: 05 Jul 2016 09:19
Last Modified: 26 Sep 2019 16:46
ISSN: 1605-8003
URI: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/4011

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item