Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty

Breznau, Nate; Rinke, Eike Mark; Wuttke, Alexander; Nguyen, Hung H. V.; Adem, Muna; Adriaans, Jule; Alvarez-Benjumea, Amalia; Andersen, Henrik K.; Auer, Daniel; Azevedo, Flavio; Bahnsen, Oke; Balzer, Dave; Bauer, Gerrit; Bauer, Paul C.; Baumann, Markus; Baute, Sharon; Benoit, Verena; Bernauer, Julian; Berning, Carl; Berthold, Anna; Bethke, Felix S.; Biegert, Thomas; Blinzler, Katharina; Blumenberg, Johannes N.; Bobzien, Licia; Bohman, Andrea; Bol, Thijs; Bostic, Amie; Brzozowska, Zuzanna; Burgdorf, Katharina; Burger, Kaspar; Busch, Kathrin B.; Carlos-Castillo, Juan; Chan, Nathan; Christmann, Pablo; Connelly, Roxanne; Czymara, Christian S.; Damian, Elena; Ecker, Alejandro; Edelmann, Achim; Eger, Maureen A.; Ellerbrock, Simon; Forke, Anna; Forster, Andrea; Gaasendam, Chris; Gavras, Konstantin; Gayle, Vernon; Gessler, Theresa; Gnambs, Timo; Godefroidt, Amélie; Grömping, Max; Groß, Martin; Gruber, Stefan; Gummer, Tobias; Hadjar, Andreas; Heisig, Jan Paul; Hellmeier, Sebastian; Heyne, Stefanie; Hirsch, Magdalena; Hjerm, Mikael; Hochman, Oshrat; Hövermann, Andreas; Hunger, Sophia; Hunkler, Christian; Huth, Nora; Ignácz, Zsófia S.; Jacobs, Laura; Jacobsen, Jannes; Jaeger, Bastian; Jungkunz, Sebastian; Jungmann, Nils; Kauff, Mathias; Kleinert, Manuel; Klinger, Julia; Kolb, Jan-Philipp; Kołczyńska, Marta; Kuk, John; Kunißen, Katharina; Kurti Sinatra, Dafina; Langenkamp, Alexander; Lersch, Philipp M.; Löbel, Lea-Maria; Lutscher, Philipp; Mader, Matthias; Madia, Joan E.; Malancu, Natalia; Maldonado, Luis; Marahrens, Helge; Martin, Nicole; Martinez, Paul; Mayerl, Jochen; Mayorga, Oscar J.; McManus, Patricia; McWagner, Kyle; Meeusen, Cecil; Meierrieks, Daniel; Mellon, Jonathan; Merhout, Friedolin; Merk, Samuel; Meyer, Daniel; Micheli, Leticia; Mijs, Jonathan; Moya, Cristóbal; Neunhoeffer, Marcel; Nüst, Daniel; Nygård, Olav; Ochsenfeld, Fabian; Otte, Gunnar; Pechenkina, Anna O.; Prosser, Christopher; Raes, Louis; Ralston, Kevin; Ramos, Miguel R.; Roets, Arne; Rogers, Jonathan; Ropers, Guido; Samuel, Robin; Sand, Gregor; Schachter, Ariela; Schaeffer, Merlin; Schieferdecker, David; Schlueter, Elmar; Schmidt, Regine; Schmidt, Katja M.; Schmidt-Catran, Alexander; Schmiedeberg, Claudia; Schneider, Jürgen; Schoonvelde, Martijn; Schulte-Cloos, Julia; Schumann, Sandy; Schunck, Reinhard; Schupp, Jürgen; Seuring, Julian; Silber, Henning; Sleegers, Willem; Sonntag, Nico; Staudt, Alexander; Steiber, NadiaORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9425-8840; Steiner, Nils; Sternberg, Sebastian; Stiers, Dieter; Stojmenovska, Dragana; Storz, Nora; Striessnig, Erich; Stroppe, Anne-Kathrin; Teltemann, Janna; Tibajev, Andrey; Tung, Brian; Vagni, Giacomo; Van Assche, Jasper; van der Linden, Meta; van der Noll, Jolanda; Van Hootegem, Arno; Vogtenhuber, StefanORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0839-4481; Voicu, Bogdan; Wagemans, Fieke; Wehl, Nadja; Werner, Hannah; Wiernik, Brenton M.; Winter, Fabian; Wolf, Christof; Yamada, Yuki; Zhang, Nan; Ziller, Conrad; Zins, Stefan and Żółtak, Tomasz (2022) Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (PNAS), 119 (44), article 2203150119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2203150119

[img]
Preview
Text
breznau-et-al-2022-observing-researchers-same-data-uncertainty.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (7MB) | Preview

Abstract

This study explores how researchers’ analytical choices affect the reliability of scientific findings. Most discussions of reliability problems in science focus on systematic biases. We broaden the lens to emphasize the idiosyncrasy of conscious and unconscious decisions that researchers make during data analysis. We coordinated 161 researchers in 73 research teams and observed their research decisions as they used the same data to independently test the same prominent social science hypothesis: that greater immigra-tion reduces support for social policies among the public. In this typical case of social science research, research teams reported both widely diverging numerical findings and substantive conclusions despite identical start conditions. Researchers’ expertise, prior beliefs, and expectations barely predict the wide variation in research outcomes. More than 95% of the total variance in numerical results remains unexplained even after qualitative coding of all identifiable decisions in each team’s workflow. This reveals a universe of uncertainty that remains hidden when considering a single study in isolation. The idiosyncratic nature of how researchers’ results and conclusions varied is a previously underappreciated explanation for why many scientific hypotheses remain contested. These results call for greater epistemic humility and clarity in reporting scientific findings.

Item Type: Article in Academic Journal
Keywords: Metascience, many analysts, researcher degrees of freedom, analytical flexibility, immigration and policy preferences
Research Units: Current Research Groups > Education and Employment
Related URLs:
Date Deposited: 03 Nov 2022 13:28
Last Modified: 03 Nov 2022 13:28
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2203150119
ISSN: 0027-8424
URI: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/6305

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item