Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research

Goisauf, Melanie; Martin, Gillian; Bentzen, Heidi Beate; Budin-Ljøsne, Isabelle; Ursin, Lars; Durnova, Anna ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5789-1850; Leitsalu, Liis; Smith, Katharine; Casati, Sara; Lavitrano, Marialuisa; Mascalzoni, Deborah; Boeckhout, Martin and Mayrhofer, Michaela Th. (2019) Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research. PLOS ONE, 14 (9), e0221496.

[img]
Preview
Text
durnova-et-al-2019-survey-european-biobank-professionals.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (452kB) | Preview

Abstract or Table of Contents

Biobanks have evolved, and their governance procedures have undergone important transformations. Our paper examines this issue by focusing on the perspective of the professionals working in management or scientific roles in research-based biobanks, who have an important impact on shaping these transformations. In particular, it highlights that recent advances in molecular medicine and genomic research have raised a range of ethical, legal and societal implications (ELSI) related to biobank-based research, impacting directly on regulations and local practices of informed consent (IC), private-public partnerships (PPPs), and engagement of participants. In our study, we investigate the ways that these concerns influence biobanking practices and assess the level of satisfaction of the cross-national biobanking research communities with the ELSI related procedures that are currently in place. We conducted an online survey among biobankers and researchers to investigate secondary use of data, informing and/or re-contacting participants, sharing of data with third parties from industry, participant engagement, and collaboration with industrial partners. Findings highlight the need for a more inclusive and transparent biobanking practice where biobanks are seen in a more active role in providing information and communicating with participants; the need to improve the current IC procedures and the role of biobanks in sharing of samples and data with industry partners and different countries, and the need for practical, tangible and hands-on ethical and legal guidance.

Item Type: Article in Academic Journal
Additional Information (public): Some of the authors were supported by EU Horizon 2020 (https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en), grant number 676550
Research Units: Techno-Science and Societal Transformation
Status: Published
Date Deposited: 20 Sep 2019 06:48
Last Modified: 20 Sep 2019 06:48
Identification Number or DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221496
ISSN: 1932-6203
URI: https://irihs.ihs.ac.at/id/eprint/5165

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item